Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Armour Packing Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; Swift & Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; Morris & Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; and Cudahy Packing Company, Petitioner, v. The United States, 1907 — 207 U.S. 590 · caselaw · US
General
Armour Packing Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; Swift & Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; Morris & Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; and Cudahy Packing Company, Petitioner, v. The United States
207 U.S. 590·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 467. No. 468. No. 469. No. 470.
Armour Packing Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; Swift & Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; Morris & Company, Petitioner, v. The United States; and Cudahy Packing Company, Petitioner, v. The United States.
October 21, 1907.
Mr. Frank Hagerman, Mr. A. R. Urion and Mr. John C. Cowin for petitioners. The Attorney General, The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Purdy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.