Torts · MBE-tested
Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu et al.
307 U.S. 616·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 441.
Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu et al.
June 5, 1939.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of the respondents for leave to file a second petition for modification of the decision and judgment of this Court and for recall and modification of its mandate granted. The opinion is amended by striking out of the second full paragraph on page 12, in the first line, the word “that” and the words “is invalid,” and inserting, after the word “decision,” the words '“as to.” In other respects the petition is denied.
Reported as amended, ante, p. 5; see also, ante, p. 613.