General
Mary R. ROULLOT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, and William McDonald and Annie McDonald, as Administrators, Defendants in Error
15 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary R. ROULLOT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, and William McDonald and Annie McDonald, as Administrators, Defendants in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 19, 1926.)
No. 84.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Wood, Molloy & Prance, of New York City (Melville J. Prance, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (John M. Ryan, Asst. U. S. Atty., and James T. Brady, both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Dills & Towsley, of New York City (Prank H. Towsley, of New York City, of counsel), for administrators.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In principle this ease is
governed by United States v. Sterling (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 921.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.