Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Armistead et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; City of Los Angeles et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Los Angeles County et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Los Angeles Branch v. Associated General Contractors of California et al., 1980 — 448 U.S. 908 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Armistead et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; City of Los Angeles et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Los Angeles County et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Los Angeles Branch v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.
448 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1980
Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and Mr. Justice Stevens would affirm the judgment.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
July 2, 1980
No. 78-1107.
No. 78-1108.
No. 78-1114.
No. 78-1382.
No. 78-1442.
Armistead et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; City of Los Angeles et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Los Angeles County et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Los Angeles Branch v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. C. D. Cal. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Fullilove v. Klutznick, ante, p. 448.
Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and Mr. Justice Stevens would affirm the judgment.
Reported below: 459 F. Supp. 766.