Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Danford N. Barney, Appellant, v. Edward P. Barker et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 569 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Danford N. Barney, Appellant, v. Edward P. Barker et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents
159 N.Y. 569·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Danford N. Barney, Appellant, v. Edward P. Barker et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents.
People ex rel. Barney v. Barker, 35 App. Div. 486, affirmed.
(Submitted June 6, 1899;
decided June 23, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 16, 1898, affirming an order of the Special Term dismissing a writ of certiorari to review an assessment.
H. M. Whitehead for appellant.
John Whalen, Corporation Cownsel (James M. Ward of counsel), for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.