Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Gerding, Jr., Respondent, v. Isaac K. Funk, Appellant, 1901 — 169 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Gerding, Jr., Respondent, v. Isaac K. Funk, Appellant
169 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Gerding, Jr., Respondent, v. Isaac K. Funk, Appellant.
Gerding v. Funic, 48 App. Div. 608, affirmed.
(Argued November 20, 1901;
decided December 10, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme. Court in the second judicial department, entered March 17, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of jfiaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
A. R. Watson, Wm. Hepburn Russell and Wm. Beverly Winslow for appellant.
Thomas Darlvngton and Abram Kli/ng for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Landon and Cullen, JJ.