Securities
Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband, Commissioner of Banks, et al.
302 U.S. 660·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 621.
Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband, Commissioner of Banks, et al.
Decided January 10, 1938.
Messrs. John L. Hall, Richard Wait, and Marcien Jenckes for appellant. Mr. Joseph B. Abrams for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Superior Court of Massachusetts.
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss or affirm is granted. The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) First National Bank v. Missouri, 263 U. S. 640, 666; Lewis v. Fidelity Co., 292 U. S. 559, 566; Jennings v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 294 U. S. 216, 219; Hornblower v. McGray, ante, p. 655. (2) Hudson Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 U. S. 349, 357; Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, 240 U. S. 342, 363; Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia P. S. Corp., 248 U. S. 372, 375, 376; Home Bldg. & L. Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U. S. 398, 437, 438.