Contracts · MBE-tested
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
368 U.S. 30·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 245.
Decided November 6, 1961.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox and John H. Caruthers for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment of the District Court is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in the light of developments which have occurred since the injunction was issued, without prejudice to consideration by that court of any application by appellees for such temporary equitable relief as they may request pending the further proceedings hereby ordered.