Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William D. Ashley, Respondent, v. Dexter D. Ashley, Appellant, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
William D. Ashley, Respondent, v. Dexter D. Ashley, Appellant
171 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William D. Ashley, Respondent, v. Dexter D. Ashley, Appellant.
Ashley v. Ashley, 61 App. Div. 622, affirmed.
(Argued April 9, 1902;
decided May 6, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff October 15, 1901, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, affirm-. ing an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
Thaddeus D. Kenneson for appellant.
James G. Meyer and William Vanamee for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Dissenting : Bartlett and Vann, JJ.