Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
City of Blackwell, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Newkirk et al., 1914 — 232 U.S. 718 · caselaw · US
General
City of Blackwell, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Newkirk et al.
232 U.S. 718·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 214.
City of Blackwell, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Newkirk et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.
Submitted January 29, 1914.
Decided February 2, 1914.
Mr. A. G. C. Bierer, Mr. Frank Dale and Mr. Joseph W. Bailey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. C. L. Pinkham and Mr. J. F. King for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY]
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Millingar v. Hartupee, 6 Wall. 258; Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336; Sawyer v. Piper, 189 U. S. 154; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U. S. 324.