Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton; and Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, et al., 1980 — 449 U.S. 950 · caselaw · US
General
ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton; and Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, et al.
449 U.S. 950·Supreme Court of the United States·1980
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 80-54.
No. 80-5049.
ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton; and Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioners in No. 80-5049 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 623 F. 2d 563.