General
City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. New Rochelle Trust Company, as Executor of Burckhard Estate and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Joseph Magnus, Appellant
240 A.D. 778·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. New Rochelle Trust Company, as Executor of Burckhard Estate and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Joseph Magnus, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and cancel the notice of pendency of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to said appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.