General
Dante OVERBY, Petitioner v. COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA, Respondent
47 A.3d 1174·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·2012·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dante OVERBY, Petitioner v. COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA, Respondent.
No. 72 EM 2012.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 5, 2012.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 5th day of July, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief, and the Petition for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.