Contracts · MBE-tested

Stemmer v. New York; and Krakower v. New York

336 U.S. 96393 L. Ed. 2d 1115·Supreme Court of the United States·1949

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

May 2, 1949. Per Curiam Decisions. No. 667. No. 568. Stemmer v. New York; and Krakower v. New York. Argued April 22, 25, 1949. Osmond K. Fraenkel argued the cause for petitioner in No. 567. With him on the brief were Arthur Carfield Hays and Sidney Struble. Harry G. Anderson argued the cause for petitioner in No. 568. With him on the brief was Harris B. Steinberg. Whitman Knapp argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Frank S. Hogan and Charles W. Manning. Decided May 2, 1949. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam:] Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.