Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry A. V. Post et al., Surviving Partners of the Firm of Post, Martin & Co., Respondents, v. Charles H. Green et al., Appellants, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
Henry A. V. Post et al., Surviving Partners of the Firm of Post, Martin & Co., Respondents, v. Charles H. Green et al., Appellants
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry A. V. Post et al., Surviving Partners of the Firm of Post, Martin & Co., Respondents, v. Charles H. Green et al., Appellants.
Post v. Green, 10 App. Div. 316, affirmed.
(Submitted March 15, 1900;
decided April 3, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 2, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Abraham Gruber for appellants.
Edward B. Hill for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.