Admiralty
National Maritime Union of America et al. v. Herzog et al.
334 U.S. 854·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 808.
National Maritime Union of America et al. v. Herzog et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The decision of the statutory three-judge court is affirmed to the extent that it passes upon the validity of § 9 (f) and § 9 (g) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (61 Stat. 136, 143; 29 U. S. C. §§ 141, 159 (f) 159 (g), Supp. 1947). We do not find it necessary to reach or consider the validity of § 9 (h).
William L. Standard and David Rein for appellants. Solicitor General Perlman for ap-pellees.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.