Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
STEVENS v. DE AUBRIE; STEVENS v. BELLEMARDE, 1870 — 154 U.S. 580 · caselaw · US
General
STEVENS v. DE AUBRIE; STEVENS v. BELLEMARDE
154 U.S. 580·Supreme Court of the United States·1870
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
STEVENS v. DE AUBRIE. STEVENS v. BELLEMARDE.
ERBCR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF KANSAS.
Nos. 45 and 46.
Argued and submitted November 16, 1870.
Decided December 6, 1870.
Smith v. Stevens, 10 Wall. 321, followed.
The ease is stated in the opinion.
Mr. J. R. Doolittle, Mr. J. W. Denver and Mr. James Hughes for plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. S- Black for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Davis]
Mr. Justice Davis
delivered the opinion of the court.
These cases are, in all respects, like the case of Smith v. Stevens, 10 Wall. 321, decided at this term, and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Kansas in each of them is affirmed.