Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Scheel, an Infant, by Henry Scheel, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Mutual Milk and Cream Company, Respondent, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 564 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
John Scheel, an Infant, by Henry Scheel, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Mutual Milk and Cream Company, Respondent
188 N.Y. 564·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Scheel, an Infant, by Henry Scheel, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Mutual Milk and Cream Company, Respondent.
(Argued March 5, 1907;
decided April 2, 1907.)
Scheel v. Mutual Milk & Cream Co., 114 App. Div. 930, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial departinent, entered August 6, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.
M. 8. Bevins, Frank V. Johnson and Jacob O. Brcmd for appellant.
It. B. Wood, George Gordon Battle and Frederick F. Fishel for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscbox and Chase, JJ.