Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Industrial Benefit Association, Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 606 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Industrial Benefit Association, Appellant
149 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Industrial Benefit Association, Appellant.
People v. Industrial Benefit Assn., 92 Hun, 811, affirmed.
(Argued May 25, 1896;
decided June 9, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made in December, 1895, which reversed an interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint and overruled the demurrer.
Walter S. MacGregor for appellant.
John W. Hogan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with costs.
All concur, except Martin and 'Vann, JJ., not sitting.