Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Cullen, Respondent, v. Patrick Gallagher, Appellant, Impleaded, etc., 1899 — 159 N.Y. 527 · caselaw · US
General
John Cullen, Respondent, v. Patrick Gallagher, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.
159 N.Y. 527·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Cullen, Respondent, v. Patrick Gallagher, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.
Reported below, 28 App. Div. 173.
(Submitted April 17, 1899;
decided April 25, 1899.)
Motion to place on the calendar an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 18, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.-
The motion was made by respondent on the ground that through laches of appellant’s attorneys a return had not been filed in time to place on present calendar.
Daniel Daly for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, without costs.