Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kaiser Industries Corp. et al. v. McLouth Steel Corp., 1969 — 393 U.S. 1119 · caselaw · US
General
Kaiser Industries Corp. et al. v. McLouth Steel Corp.
393 U.S. 1119·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 949.
Kaiser Industries Corp. et al. v. McLouth Steel Corp.
William H. Webb, John A. Dienner, John M. Webb, W. Brown Morton, Jr., and George E. Brand, Jr., for petitioners.
William B. Cudlip, John Vaughan Groner, and Ronald F. Ball for respondent.
David Ginsburg for Government of Austria, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of Government of Austria for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.