Contracts · MBE-tested
Mack v. Levy et al.
43 F. 73·United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York·1890
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mack v. Levy et al.
(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
June 26, 1890.)
H. A. West, for plaintiff.
James A. Hudson, for defendants.
[MAJORITY — Shipman, J.]
Shipman, J.
These are two petitions, one by tho plaintiff, and one by the defendants, for a rehearing of the above-entitled cause. I have examined the papers and the briefs, and seo no reason for a rehearing, and therefore each application is denied. I had intended to state, as usual, my reasons for the denial, but, upon further consideration, it appears to me that the main questions depend entirely upon the proper construction of the patent; that I have clearly, though briefly, stated my construction; and that I can hardly hope to express my idea with more clearness by additional observations on the subject.