Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David H. Cole, Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant, 1872 — 48 N.Y. 679 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
David H. Cole, Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant
48 N.Y. 679·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David H. Cole, Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 4, 1871;
decided January term, 1872.)
Action to recover damages sustained by plaintiff while a passenger upon defendant’s road. The cars ran off the track in consequence of a broken rail. Decided upon the ground that there was no evidence in the case showing any negligence or fault upon the part of the defendant.
A. P. Laning for the appellant.
W. P. Cogswell for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Lott, Ch. C., and Hunt, C., read for affirmance.
Earl, C., reads for reversal.
For reversal, Earl, Leonard and Gray, OC.
For affirmance, Lott, Ch. C., and Hunt, C.
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event.