Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gilson Brothers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 1949 — 338 U.S. 891 · caselaw · US
General
Gilson Brothers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board
338 U.S. 891·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 383.
Gilson Brothers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board.
Clark M. Robertson and Howard R. Johnson for petitioner. Thomas E. Fairchild, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Stewart G. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, and Beatrice Lamport, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. Solicitor General Perlman and Robert N. Denham filed a brief for the National Labor Relations Board, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Certiorari denied.