General
Moses Tanenbaum, Respondent, v. Samuel Eiseman et al., Appellants; Moses Tanenbaum, Respondent, v. Abraham Levy et al., Appellants
178 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Moses Tanenbaum, Respondent, v. Samuel Eiseman et al., Appellants. Moses Tanenbaum, Respondent, v. Abraham Levy et al., Appellants.
Tanenbaum, v. Eiseman, 83 App. Div. 639, affirmed; Tanenbaum v Levy, 83 App. Div. 319, affirmed.
(Argued March 30, 1904;
decided April 26, 1904.)
Appeal from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 4, 1903, modifying and affirming as modified judgments in favor of plaintiff entered upon verdicts directed by the court and affirming orders denying motions for new trials.
A. Blvmenstiel for appellants.
Ernest Hall and Mayer L. Halff for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J.,. Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.