Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New York v. Cardinal, doing business as Cardinal Engineering Co., 1953 — 345 U.S. 918 · caselaw · US
General
New York v. Cardinal, doing business as Cardinal Engineering Co.
345 U.S. 918·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 598.
New York v. Cardinal, doing business as Cardinal Engineering Co.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General of New York, Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor General, and Henry S. Manley, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.
Daniel McNamara for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied for the reason that application therefor was not made within the time provided by law. 28 U. S. C. § 2101 (c).