Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Adam Ritter, Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Margaret Krekeler, impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1873 — 52 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
General
Adam Ritter, Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Margaret Krekeler, impleaded, etc., Appellant
52 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adam Ritter, Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Margaret Krekeler, impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued February 11, 1873;
decided February 18, 1873.)
Decided upon the facts in the case.
Henry A. Frost for the appellant.
D. M. Porter for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Chdeoh, Ch. J.,]
Chdeoh, Ch. J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed