Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Glidden Company v. Zdanok et al., 1962 — 368 U.S. 973 · caselaw · US
General
Glidden Company v. Zdanok et al.
368 U.S. 973·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 22, 1962.
No. 242.
Glidden Company v. Zdanok et al.
[MAJORITY]
Cer-tiorari, ante, p. 814, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion of Francis M. Shea, Esquire, for leave to participate in oral argument on behalf of the United States Court of Claims, as amicus curiae, is granted.