Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hawaii v. Gordon (formerly Bell), 1963 — 372 U.S. 901 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Hawaii v. Gordon (formerly Bell)
372 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 18, 1963.
No. 12, Original.
Hawaii v. Gordon (formerly Bell).
Bert T. Kobayashi, Attorney General of Hawaii, Thurman Arnold, Abe Fortas, Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons on the motion.
[For earlier orders herein, see 371 U. S. 804; 371 U. S. 966.]
[MAJORITY]
The motion of the plaintiff to advance is granted and the case is set for oral argument on Monday, April 15, 1963.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.