Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Unjieng et al. v. National City Bank et al., 1938 — 305 U.S. 649 · caselaw · US
General
Unjieng et al. v. National City Bank et al.
305 U.S. 649·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 320.
Unjieng et al. v. National City Bank et al.
December 5, 1938.
Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert, Mahlon B. Doing, and Lewis A. R. Innerarity for petitioners.
Mr. Carl A. Mead for National City Bank, and Messrs. James Ross, Ewald E. Selph, and James M. Ross for Malabon Sugar Co. et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to consider this, application on an abbreviated record granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Philippines denied.