Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Powell v. Hart, U. S. District Judge, 1970 — 396 U.S. 1055 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Powell v. Hart, U. S. District Judge
396 U.S. 1055·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1197,
Misc.
Powell v. Hart, U. S. District Judge.
Herbert O. Reid, Arthur Kinoy, Robert L. Carter, Hubert T. Delany, William Kunstler, Frank D. Reeves, and Henry R. Williams for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.