General

In the Matter of the Application of Antonio De Falco, Respondent, against William E. Walsh and Others, etc., Defendants, and Joseph Zorn, Intervening Appellant

232 A.D. 686·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Application of Antonio De Falco, Respondent, against William E. Walsh and Others, etc., Defendants, and Joseph Zorn, Intervening Appellant. [MAJORITY] The decision of this court handed down on January 16, 1931, is hereby amended to read as followa: Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Motion for reargument denied. It should be understood that the affirmance is intended to be without prejudice to an application to the board of standards and appeals for a variance if so advised. Stay granted for thirty days to enable appellant to apply to the Court of Appeals. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ. See ante, p. — [Rep.