Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 1960 — 361 U.S. 951 · caselaw · US
General
Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board
361 U.S. 951·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 5, 1960.
No. 537.
Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to use as part of the record the printed record heretofore filed with this Court in No. 48, October Term, 1955, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the -District of Columbia Circuit granted.
John J. Abt and Joseph .Forer for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney' General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney, George B. Searls and Frank R. Hunter, Jr. for respondent.