Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Addington v. Tennessee, 1955 — 348 U.S. 924 · caselaw · US
General
Addington v. Tennessee
348 U.S. 924·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 250,
Misc.
Addington v. Tennessee.
[MAJORITY — “Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Tennessee. Motion to modify the order entered in this case on December 6, 1954, 348 U. S. 892, granted and the order is modified so as to read as follows:
“Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Insofar as the papers whereon the appeal was taken seek review of rulings of the court below upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution which by themselves would not be subject to review by appeal, the papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari (28 U. S. C. § 2103), and certiorari is denied.”