Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Calmar Steamship Corp. v. United States; and Calmar Steamship Corp. v. Scott et al., 1952 — 344 U.S. 853 · caselaw · US
General
Calmar Steamship Corp. v. United States; and Calmar Steamship Corp. v. Scott et al.
344 U.S. 853·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 262.
No. 303.
Calmar Steamship Corp. v. United States; and Calmar Steamship Corp. v. Scott et al.
Edwin S. Murphy, Ira A. Campbell and Helen C. Cunningham for petitioner.
Acting Solicitor General Stern filed a memorandum stating that the Government does not oppose the granting of the petition in No. 262, and also a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae, in No. 303, agreeing that the petition raises important questions of federal law appropriate for decision by this Court.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 197 F. 2d 795.
Russell T. Mount for respondents in No. 303.