Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John J. Cooper, Respondent, v. Amelia Cooper et al., Respondents. Peter Eagan, Appellant, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 576 · caselaw · US
General
John J. Cooper, Respondent, v. Amelia Cooper et al., Respondents. Peter Eagan, Appellant
164 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John J. Cooper, Respondent, v. Amelia Cooper et al., Respondents. Peter Eagan, Appellant.
Oooper v. Oooper, 51 App. Div. 595, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted October 2, 1900;
decided October 16, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 1, 1900, affirming an order of Special Term modifying a previous order made by that court by reducing the amount of an extra allowance granted to the plaintiff’s attorney.
Frcmkl-m Bien for appellant.
Louis Oohen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ.