General
Emilie Kuntz and Jacob Medicus, as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. Nils Peter Emil Peterson, Appellant, and Sarah M. Peterson, Defendant
163 A.D. 867·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1914·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emilie Kuntz and Jacob Medicus, as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. Nils Peter Emil Peterson, Appellant, and Sarah M. Peterson, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
In place of the 2d paragraph of the order, it is ordered that appellant produce from time to time at the examination such competent ■writings as are relevant to the subject-matter, upon demand for and a description thereof; and the order as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.