Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eben B. Waite et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Eben B. Waite et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
110 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eben B. Waite et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 20, 1888;
decided June 26, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Ten i of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made at the January Term, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict.
Decided upon the facts.
C. D. Prescott for appellant.
Hadley Jones for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Finch, J.,]
Finch, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.