General
Arthur E. Fanroth, Respondent, v. James J. Byrne, as President of the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, and James J. Heffernan, as Superintendent of Highways of the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, Appellants
226 A.D. 673·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1929·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arthur E. Fanroth, Respondent, v. James J. Byrne, as President of the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, and James J. Heffernan, as Superintendent of Highways of the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and judgment directed dismissing the complaint, with costs, upon the authority of Greeley Sight Seeing Co. v. Byrne (224 App. Div. 752). Young, Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.