Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William B. Pritchard, as Executor of Marie V. Hunt, Deceased, Respondent, v. Barbara I. Kirsch, Appellant, and Society of St. Vincent de Paul, Respondent, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 637 · caselaw · US
General
William B. Pritchard, as Executor of Marie V. Hunt, Deceased, Respondent, v. Barbara I. Kirsch, Appellant, and Society of St. Vincent de Paul, Respondent
171 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William B. Pritchard, as Executor of Marie V. Hunt, Deceased, Respondent, v. Barbara I. Kirsch, Appellant, and Society of St. Vincent de Paul, Respondent.
Pritchard v. Kirsch, 58 App. Div. 332, affirmed.
(Argued April 7, 1902;
decided April 18, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 23, 1901, upon an order which reversed in part a judgment of Special Term construing the will of Marie V. Hunt, deceased.
Louis Sturcke for appellant.
Michael J. Scanlan for Society of St. Vincent de Paul, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.