General
George Fruh, Respondent, v. Walter F. Duckworth et al., Appellants
162 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Pabicer, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Cullen, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Fruh, Respondent, v. Walter F. Duckworth et al., Appellants.
Fruh v. Duckworth, 23 App. Div. 624, affirmed.
(Argued April 2, 1900;
decided April 17, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 14, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
Maurice S. Hyman for appellants.
Reuben H. Underhill and George L. Robinson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pabicer, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Cullen, J.