Contracts · MBE-tested
ROSSO et ux. v. PUERTO RICO
393 U.S. 14·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Eortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROSSO et ux. v. PUERTO RICO.
No. 242.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Walter L. Newsom, Jr., and James B. Donovan for appellants.
Rafael A. Rivera-Cruz, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, J. F. Rodriguez-Rivera, Deputy Solicitor General, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Eortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.