Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CLYDE-MALLORY LINES, Appellee, v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. (Consolidated Cause.), 1935 — 75 F.2d 1008 · caselaw · US
General
CLYDE-MALLORY LINES, Appellee, v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. (Consolidated Cause.)
75 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CLYDE-MALLORY LINES, Appellee, v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. (Consolidated Cause.)
No. 243.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 4, 1935.
John E. Morrissey, of New York City, for appellant.
Burlingham; Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Frederic Conger, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.