Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Lissa et al., Appellants, v. Emil Goodkind et al., Respondents, 1890 — 125 N.Y. 707 · caselaw · US
General
Henry Lissa et al., Appellants, v. Emil Goodkind et al., Respondents
125 N.Y. 707·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Lissa et al., Appellants, v. Emil Goodkind et al., Respondents.
(Argued December 10, 1890;
decided December 19, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, entered upon an order made May 6, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court and affirmed .an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Sol Kohn for appellants.
Gibson Putzel for respondents
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.