Contracts · MBE-tested
Florence I. Buhl, Respondent, v. Samuel Bessel, Max Bessel and Abraham Bessel, Appellants
255 A.D. 983·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1938·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Florence I. Buhl, Respondent, v. Samuel Bessel, Max Bessel and Abraham Bessel, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
In an action on a bond, in which the amended answer alleged defenses of fraud and want of consideration, order of the County Court of Nassau county granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present- — -Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.