Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary E. Beck, as Administratrix of Louis Beck, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Catholic University of America, Respondent, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 611 · caselaw · US
General
Mary E. Beck, as Administratrix of Louis Beck, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Catholic University of America, Respondent
184 N.Y. 611·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary E. Beck, as Administratrix of Louis Beck, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Catholic University of America, Respondent.
Beck v. Catholic University of America, 96 App. Div. 627, affirmed.
(Argued April 2, 1906;
decided April 17, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 5, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of- defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
Alton B. Parker and Allen Caruthers for appellant.
Abram I. Elkus and Joseph M. Proskauer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.