Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas M. RIVES, Superintendent Washington Asylum and Jail, Appellant, v. George DODSON, Appellee, 1934 — 73 F.2d 985 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas M. RIVES, Superintendent Washington Asylum and Jail, Appellant, v. George DODSON, Appellee
73 F.2d 985·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas M. RIVES, Superintendent Washington Asylum and Jail, Appellant, v. George DODSON, Appellee.
No. 6225.
United States Court oí Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Argued Oct. 2, 3,934.
Decided Nov. 5, 1934.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — HITZ, Associate Justice.]
HITZ, Associate Justice.
This appeal relates to an order of the Supreme court of the District in a habeas corpus proceeding discharging appellee, Dodson, who had been sentenced and committed to jail on June 30, 1933, for violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA), and involves the same question decided this day in No. 6207, Rives v. O’Hearne, 64 App. D. C. 48, 73 F.(2d) 984. For the reasons therein stated, the order discharging appellee is reversed.
Reversed.