General
Murray Priceman, Appellant, v. Samuel Priceman, Respondent. (Action No. 1.); Shore Ridge Associates et al., Respondents, v. Murray Priceman, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
65 A.D.2d 787·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1978·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Murray Priceman, Appellant, v Samuel Priceman, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Shore Ridge Associates et al., Respondents, v Murray Priceman, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
—Appeal from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 24, 1976, which, inter alia, permitted Jerry Priceman to continue the partnership business for the purpose of winding up its affairs. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. We interpret the order appealed from to direct a full accounting from the time of notice of dissolution to the time of dissolution. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.