Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pennsylvania v. New York et al., 1971 — 400 U.S. 1019 · caselaw · US
General
Pennsylvania v. New York et al.
400 U.S. 1019·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 40,
Orig.
Pennsylvania v. New York et al.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of State of Arizona for leave to intervene as a party defendant, and motion of State of Indiana for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff referred to Special Master. [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 924.]