General
SHEETS et al. v. PUGH et al.
224 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHEETS et al. v. PUGH et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 3, 1915.)
No. 2600.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Eastern District of Washington.
John J. Skuse and Fred B. Morrill, both of Spokane, Wash., for appellants.
Reese H. Voorhees, of Spokane, Wash., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel, for appellants, and pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties thereto, appeal dismissed, without costs to either party.